Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国和沙特的伙伴关系是如何修补的?

拜登上任之初曾扬言要让沙特王国成为一个被厌弃的国家。但在动荡不安的中东,他们的关系比以往任何时候都更加紧密。

Z世代引领金融硕士课程的复兴

科技行业裁员让寻找高薪商业职业的年轻人转向金融业。
1天前

英国央行会发出即将降息的信号吗?

《市场问题》是英国《金融时报》对未来一周的指南。
2天前

印度颁布出口禁令后巴基斯坦大米出口量创下纪录

这对于面对两位数通胀和经济增长乏力的巴基斯坦来说是一个好消息。

美国高管薪酬以14年来最快速度增长

数据显示,2024年迄今,标普500成分股公司首席执行官的薪酬中值上升了12%。

更少的肉和更少的新场馆:奥运会是如何努力走向绿色的

巴黎奥运组织者承诺将温室气体排放量从伦敦和里约的水平减少一半。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×